a5c7b9f00b Three women, detectives with a mysterious boss, retrieve stolen voice-ID software, using martial arts, tech skills, and sex appeal. The Angels Natalie, Dylan, and Alex are sent to place a bug in the voice-recognition system that bitter rival Roger Corwin has stolen. The Angels &amp; Bosley must save Charlie&#39;s life. See them kick the sh*t out of people with high-tech martial arts! I went to see &#39;Charlie&#39;s Angels&#39; out of interest after all the interesting coverage from the set.<br/><br/>The laughably complex plot seems to flow along well with the movie. I found it particularly funny, and enjoyed all the fighting scenes and the fabulous soundtrack.<br/><br/>The performances impressed me the most. Everyone looks like they&#39;re having fun, but my favourite was Natalie (Cameron Diaz). When she smiles, you can&#39;t help but smile along with her. I also admired that the girls also did all their own stunts, something not too common in films. And despite the rumours, Bill Murray and the girls had good chemistry and he proved an able sidekick to the girls.<br/><br/>With that said, I&#39;ll say four words: Bring on the sequel! Disappointing because it starts off reasonably well. When it sticks to satire, it does very well, and Drew Barrymore is excellent in her part. But someone lost faith in the satire concept and mixed in characters that do NOT belong, suchTom Green&#39;s &quot;Chad&quot; and Matt Le Blanc&#39;s standard dope. They turn the tone from satiric to spoof to silly lower case Saturday night Live skits – a feeling capped off by Bill Murray&#39;s lounge-lizard performance&quot;Bosley.&quot; Too bad. A potato chip of a movie. Tasty and lightweight, it's fine for a cinematic snack, if that's what you're looking for. Making it an entire meal, however, really isn't advisable.
Sturcogote Admin replied
365 weeks ago